Resources of Innovation Activity as Factors in Managing Sustainable Development of Organizations and Territories

Recursos de la Actividad de Innovación como Factores de Gestión del Desarrollo Sostenible de las Organizaciones y los Territorios

Authors

  • Aleksandra Minchenkova Bernardo O'Higgins University, Santiago, Chile
  • Lidia Minchenkova Bernardo O'Higgins University, Santiago, Chile; The Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University,Russia
  • Claudio Ruff Escobar Bernardo O'Higgins University, Santiago, Chile
  • Elena Zenkina The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration , Moscow, Russia
  • Petr Aleksandrovich Kostromin The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration , Moscow, Russia
  • Marcelo Ruiz Bernardo O'Higgins University, Santiago, Chile
  • Mauricio Carvache Franco Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador,Durán, Ecuador; Universidad ESAN, Graduate School of Business,Lima,Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23854/07199562.2025613.minchenkova

Keywords:

sustainability, innovation resources, patent activity, R&D expenditure, SDG 9, development management

Abstract

This study examines how innovation resources affect the management of sustainable development across countries and determines the strength and direction of the influence of innovations and innovation resources on the results of the aggregate Sustainable Development Index of countries.

 

Using the Sustainable Development Report 2024, which provides data on countries’ performance in achieving each of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG Index), correlation-regression and variance analysis methods were applied to construct models that estimate the dependency of the aggregate Sustainable Development Index (SDI) on the outcomes of Goal 9 — Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure — for the year 2023, as well as using cumulative data over the 24-year period from 2000 to 2023.

 

Drawing on data from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the World Bank, the analysis examined the relationship between the composite SDI and the performance in SDG 9. The regression model for 2023 accounts for approximately 72% of the variance in SDI scores. Additional models based on patent applications and R&D expenditure explain 62% and 46.9% of the variance, respectively. These results suggest that intellectual and human resources in innovation exert a stronger influence on sustainable development outcomes than financial investment alone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf

Chaparro-Banegas, N., Ibañez Escribano, A. M., Mas-Tur, A., et al. (2024). Innovation facilitators and sustainable development: A country comparative approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 8467–8495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03055-w

Daly, H. (2018). Envisioning a successful steady-state economy. The Journal of Population and Sustainability, 3(1), 21–33.

Davydenko, N Buriak, A., & Titenko, Z. (2019). Financial support for the development of innovation activities. ekonomika, 13(2), 144–151.

Diakonova, S., Artyshchenko, S., Sysoeva, D., & Surovtsev, I. (2020). Study of periodic processes of changing the number of innovations in relation to Kondratiev cycles. E3S Web of Conferences, 157, 04031. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015704031

Filser, M., Kraus, S., Roig-Tierno, N., Kailer, N., & Fischer, U. (2019). Entrepreneurship as catalyst for sustainable development: Opening the black box. Sustainability, 11(16), 4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11164503

Fournier, V. (2008). Escaping from the economy: The politics of degrowth. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28(11–12), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330810915233

Hamilton, C. (2003). Growth Fetish. Allen & Unwin.

Horbach, J. (2016). Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2015.09.005

Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43(1), 291–316.

Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9153-7

Meadows, D. L., Burch, W. R., & Bormann, F. H. (1975). Beyond growth: Essays on alternative futures. Yale University Press.

Queiroz, M. D., Matos, R. N., & Mesquita, R. F. (2022). Relations between innovation management and organisational sustainability: A case study in a Brazilian higher education institution. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 11127–11152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01900-4

Raffer, K., & Singer, H. W. (2002). The economic North-South divide: Six decades of unequal development. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Ruff Escobar, C., Ruiz Toledo, M., Matheu Pérez, A., & Juica Martínez, P. (2020). Mixed financing policies in higher education and their impact on social mobility in Chile. Gestión y Política Pública, 29(2), 413–445.

Sukharev, O. S. (2024). Sustainable development: "Acumulative effect" and "distributed management". In Economic science today (Vol. 20, pp. 7–19). Belarusian National Technical University. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2024-20-7-19

Szopik-Depczynska, K., Cheba, K., Bak, I., Stajniak, M., Simboli, A., & Ioppolo, G. (2018). The study of relationship in a hierarchical structure of EU sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, 90, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2018.03.002 The Sustainable Development Report. (2024a). Downloads. Access full database. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/static/downloads/files/SDR2024-data.xlsx

The Sustainable Development Report. (2024b). Interactive map. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/map

United Nations. (2021a). The 17 Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/es/goals

United Nations. (2021b). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/es/node/24494

von Weizsäcker, E., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L. (2000). Factor four: Doubling wealth, halving resource use. A report to the Club of Rome (A. P. Zavarnitsyn & V. D. Novikov, Trans.; G. A. Mesyats, Ed.). Academia.

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books.

WIPO. (2025). Intellectual Property Statistics Data Center. https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/ips-search/patent

World Bank. (2025). DataBank. World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Zakharov, V. M., Minin, A. A., & Trofimov, I. E. (2018). Study of developmental homeostasis: From population developmental biology and the health of environment concept to the sustainable development concept. Russian Journal of Developmental Biology, 49, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360418010071

Ziemnowicz, C. (2020). Joseph A. Schumpeter and innovation. In Carayannis, E. G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 1517–1522). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_476

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Minchenkova, A., Minchenkova, L., Ruff Escobar , C., Zenkina , E., Aleksandrovich Kostromin, P., Ruiz, M., & Carvache Franco, M. (2025). Resources of Innovation Activity as Factors in Managing Sustainable Development of Organizations and Territories: Recursos de la Actividad de Innovación como Factores de Gestión del Desarrollo Sostenible de las Organizaciones y los Territorios. Revista Geográfica De Chile Terra Australis, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.23854/07199562.2025613.minchenkova