An ignored relationship: Extreme events and fiscal centralism in Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23854/07199562.2024602.vialKeywords:
Fiscal Decentralization, Extreme Events, Centralism, Subnational Governments, ChileAbstract
Chile is a highly centralized country with high levels of risk from disasters and extreme events. This double feature has encouraged the creation of several public organizations with a strong territorial vocation, and public innovations have been developed in subnational public management to improve emergency containment, recovery, or reconstruction when necessary. However, even if strong local and subnational governments are considered essential for risk prevention, it seems that the occurrence of extreme events tends to reinforce fiscal centralism, and not to empower local administrations. This article analyses the budgetary effects of extreme events on the relationship between the central government and the Chilean regions between 1992 and 2022. For this, a measurement is designed to compare the amount of money invested by the sixteen regional governments versus the central government's investment in each region over three decades, putting a special focus on years with extreme events. The results show that central investment increases in regions where extreme events are highly destructive, which reinforces fiscal centralism. This goes in the opposite direction to current risk prevention literature, which points to the need for strong subnational governments capable of facing extreme situations.
Downloads
References
BAE, Y., JOO, Y., & WON, S. 2015. Decentralization and collaborative disaster governance. Habitat International, 52, 50-56.
BIRKLAND, T. 2007. Lessons of Disaster. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press
BO, W. 2022. Fiscal Decentralization and Natural Disaster Relief in China. Advances in Politics and Economics. Vol. 5, No. 4, 2022
BOISIER, S. 2007. Territorio, Estado y sociedad en Chile. La dialéctica de la descentralización: entre la geografía y la gobernabilidad. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Alcalá de Henares, Alcalá de Henares.
CAMUS, P., ARENAS, F., LAGOS, M., & ROMERO, A. 2016. Visión histórica de la respuesta a las amenazas naturales en Chile y oportunidades de gestión del riesgo de desastre. Revista de geografía Norte Grande, (64), 9-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022016000200002
DAVIDSSON, Å. 2020. Disasters as an Opportunity for Improved Environmental Conditions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 48 (September): 101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101590
DE VILLE DE GOYET, C. 2008. Information Gaps in Relief, Recovery, and Reconstruction in the Aftermath of Natural Disasters. In Amin S., & Goldstein, M. (Eds.): Data Against Natural Disasters. Washington: World Bank.
ELAZAR, D. 1987. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
ESCALERAS, M., & REGISTER, C.A. 2021. Fiscal decentralization and natural hazard risks. Public Choice 151, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9740-4
FALLETI, T. G. 2005. A sequencial theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in a comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99, Nº 3.
GALILEA, S., LETELIER. L. & ROSS, K. 2011. Descentralización de servicios esenciales. Los casos de Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica y México en salud, educación residuos, seguridad y fomento. Santiago: CEPAL.
GARSCHAGEN, M. 2015. Decentralizing urban disaster risk management in a centralized system? Agendas, actors and contentions in Vietnam. Habitat International, 1-7
HERMANSSON, H. 2019. Challenges to Decentralization of Disaster Management in Turkey: The Role of Political-Administrative Context, International Journal of Public Administration, 42:5, 417-431, DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1466898
HERMANSSON, H. 2020. Decentralization and Recentralization of Disaster Management in Turkey. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance / [ed] Ali Farazmand, Cham: Springer, 2020, p. 1-7.
HEYMANN, D. 1988. Input controls in the public sector: What does economic theory offer? International Monetary Fund., Working Paper Nº 59.
IQBAL, K., & AHMED, M. 2009. Disaster and Decentralization. Carleton College Department of Economics, pp. 206-214.
JENKINS, D.G., & QUINTANA-ASCENCIO P.F. 2020. A solution to minimum sample size for regressions. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0229345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229345
KNEELAND, T. 2020. Playing Politics with Natural Disaster. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
LETELIER, L. 2012. Teoría y práctica de la descentralización fiscal. Santiago: Ediciones UC.
LEVINTHAL, D. 1988. A survey of agency models of organization”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, March.
MARDONES, R. 2008. Descentralización: una definición y una evaluación de la agenda legislativa chilena (1990-2008). EURE, XXXIV. Nº 102.
MARKS, D., & LEBEL, L. 2016. Disaster governance and the scalar politics of incomplete decentralization: Fragmented and contested responses to the 2011 floods in Central Thailand. Habitat International, Volume 52, Pages 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.024.
MINISTERIO DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE. 2020. Informe del Estado del Medio Ambiente. Recuperado en 05 de marzo de 2023, de https://sinia.mma.gob.cl/estado-del-medio-ambiente/informe-del-estado-del-medio-ambiente-2020/
MONTECINOS, E. 2005. Antecedents in the Historical Relation Between Centralism and Decentralization in Chile. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 10(31), 433-462. Recuperado en 01 de julio de 2021, de http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-99842005000300006&lng=es&tlng=en .
NAVARRETE, B. 2008. Modernización del Estado en la transición chilena. El gobierno de Patricio Aylwin (1990-1994). Revista Enfoques. Ciencia Política y Administración Pública, 6 (9), segundo semestre: 79 – 101.
NAVARRETE, B., & HIGUERAS, V. 2014. Chile desde la teoría secuencial de la descentralización, 1990-2010. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 21 (66), septiembre-diciembre: 179 – 202.
OATES, W. 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
OLSHANSKY, R., HOPKINS, L., & JOHNSON, L. 2012. Disaster and Recovery: Processes Compressed in Time. Natural Hazards Review, Volume 13, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000077
PALMA, E., & RUFIÁN, D. 1989. Las nociones de centralización y descentralización. ILPES, Documento CPS-48.
PERTIWI, P., GWYNNYTH L., & MICHELLE V. 2020. “Disability Representation in Indonesian Disaster Risk Reduction Regulatory Frameworks.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 45(May): 101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101454.
PUTRA, D.I., & MATSUYUKI, M. 2019. Disaster Management Following Decentralization in Indonesia: Regulation, Institutional Establishment, Planning, and Budgeting. Journal of Disaster Research.
RACZYNSKI, D., & SERRANO, C. 2001. Descentralización: Nudos críticos. Santiago: CIEPLAN.
RODDEN, J. 2004. Comparative federalism and decentralization. One meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36, 4.
RONDINELLI, D. A., NELLIS, J. R., & CHEEMA, G. S. 1983. Decentralization in developing countries: a review of recent experience World Bank Staff Working Papers, 581. Washington: World Bank.
SKIDMORE M., & TOYA H. 2013. “Natural Disaster Impacts and Fiscal Decentralization.” Land Economics 89 (1): 101–17.
SAMPEDRO, M.C., HERRERO, A., LAGO-PEÑAS, S., & MARTÍNEZ-VÁSQUEZ, J. 2022. Extreme Events and the Resilience of Decentralized Governance. Governance and Economics Research Network. Working Paper A 2022 – 12
SAMUELSON, P. 1954. The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVI, N°4.
TIEBOUT, C. 1956. A pure theory of public expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64.
VALENZUELA, E. 2015. Descentralización ya. Santiago: RIL.
VIAL, C. 2021. Chile. In Vial, Camilo; & Rodríguez, Adrián. Medición y agenda para el desarrollo territorial en América Latina: El Índice de Desarrollo Regional LATAM. Santiago: Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Universidad de la República Uruguay.
VIAL, C. 2014. El proceso de descentralización en Chile y el desarrollo regional: un análisis del período 1990-2010. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid.
VIAL, C. 2013. Political and fiscal decentralization in South America: A comparative analysis of Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. In Cuadrado-Roura, Juan R.; Aroca, Patricio (Eds.): Regional problems and policies in Latin America. Berlin – Heilderberg: Srpinger.
ZANG, X. 2022. Environmental accidents and environmental legislation in China: Evidence from provincial panel data (1997–2014). Politics & Policy 50: 77– 92. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12446
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Geográfica de Chile Terra Australis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
Revista Geográfica de Chile Terra Australis retains the economic rights (copyright) of the works published in the Revista Geográfica de Chile Terra Australis. The reuse of the content is allowed under a license:
CC BY
Recognition
This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak and build upon your work, even for commercial purposes, as long as you are acknowledged as the author of the original creation. This is the most helpful license offered. It is recommended for maximum dissemination and use of the materials subject to the license.
